January 13th: We woke that morning, curled up as spoons, naked and warm. We dressed and made our way out for coffee and hash browns. As we cut across my neighborhood streets, he talked of buying a new television, and of the work he had in the coming months. There were plans made to see a movie the following weekend, or possibly the weekend after that, depending upon our schedules. He held my hand.
The diner was too crowded and, standing there with our greasy, oversized menus, I lost my appetite. I drove him home, both of us with empty bellies, parked the car and kissed him goodbye. He told me that he would call me later.
It was six weeks before I learned that he was seeing someone, that he had been seeing this someone for the last month. Two weeks after he left my bedroom, two weeks after he had kissed me goodbye and promised to call, he had taken up with a friend of a friend. “It just happened,” he said later, apologetically. And, yes, it had most certainly happened, but there was nothing just about it.
His calls and texts to me never diminished in number. Our now-visitless weekends were excused with a sick note, then a full plate of work and studies. I was used to this; it didn’t seem abnormal, this disappearance. Because, though gone, his means of contact acted as a substitute for his presence. He was still reaching out to me, maintaining a connection through a phone line. I accepted his excuses as truths and believed these obstacles to be only temporary. History had shown that he would be back; that he would pull away for a period and that he would return. I waited, as I always do.
Weeks later, when he was found out, he argued that it had been over from the moment he walked out my door that Sunday morning; that he and I both had known this.
But I hadn’t known and, still, looking back on it, I cannot see how this could be as clear as he had implied. His kiss didn’t tell me that it was over. His calls didn’t convey this fact. His constant text messages didn’t clue me in on the demise of the relationship. It was not over for me - his constant contact kept the idea of ‘us’ very much alive.
Tonight, I’m doing the math. January 13th, he’s with me. January 19th, he’s ill. January 26th, he’s studying. January 27th, he’s hungover. His texts are a timeline - easy to piece together and impossible to ignore, much as I would like to.
He left his books and went out that night, January 26th, where he met her. And, I imagine because it was easier for him to rationalize the actions he was about to take, he assured himself that we were, in fact, over. He pursued her, likely in the same manner in which he pursued me at our beginning. He called her, doted upon her and, ultimately, he obtained her.
But all the while, he was phoning me. Keeping the lines open, communicating nothing. The morning after it had ‘just happened’, he ‘just happened’ to text me. The day of their first date, he dialed my number. The night after he fucked her for the first time, he was my goodnight call.
All this time, while he was cooing and wooing and taking the steps one takes when something ‘just happens’, I was waiting.
But was I in denial? Is it denial to take someone at their word? Is it denial to remain involved with one who has not formally detached themselves from you? Apparently, yes.
They say that after denial comes anger. I can feel this anger rising, but am uncertain as to its rightful target. It would be easy to unleash this rage upon him, but to what purpose? He knows what he did, as do I. Do I savor my fury? Do I punish him for having hurt me? Will that lead me with ease into the next stage? Will it push me along, toward the sweet light of acceptance?
I don’t know the answer to that. Maybe it would be easier to not think about it. Maybe it would be better to not push it; if it were to ’just happen’.
Because, you know, sometimes things ‘just happen’, or so I’ve been told.
It would be so easy if that didn’t ‘just happen’ to be complete and utter bullshit.
I’ve most definitely reached the anger stage. Hmmph. Wow.
It just happened.